The Grimsby Record

Committee of Adjustment

July 12, 2011

What was decided (9 motions)

9 carried, 0 recorded otherwise. Every motion below is printed as the minutes print it.

Resolved that the minutes of the Committee of Adjustment meeting of June 7, 2011 be approved as circulated.
Moved by H. Nobes, seconded by P. Settimi
Carried
Resolved that Submission A-17/11 by Frederick and Debra MacDonald, for a Minor Variance from the provisions of By-law 71-74, as amended by By- law 88-39 Section 11, Residential R2 Zone, to allow for the creation with a lot frontage of 5.0 metres a minimum sideyard setback of 3.0 metres, a lot area of 1000 square metres and a lot coverage of 30% in a Residential R2 Zone at # 67 Lake Street, Grimsby be denied for the following reasons: 1. The Variance is not minor in nature.
Moved by H. Nobes, seconded by P. Settimi
Carried
Resolved that Submission A-18/11 by Frederick & Debra MacDonald for a Minor Variance from the provisions of By-law 71-74, as amended by By- law 88-39 Section 11 Residential R2 Zone to allow for lot creation with a lot frontage of 4.0 metres, a minimum sideyard setback of 3.0 metres, a lot area of 1200 square metres and a lot coverage of 30% in a Residential R2 Zone at # 69 Lake Street, Grimsby be denied for the following reasons: 1. The Variance is not minor in nature.
Moved by H. Nobes, seconded by P. Settimi
Carried
Resolved that Submission B-04/11 by Frederick & Debra MacDonald, for consent to convey be denied as per the Notice of Decision.
Moved by H. Nobes, seconded by P. Settimi
Carried
Resolved that Submission B-05/11 by Frederick & Debra MacDonald, for consent to convey be denied as per the Notice of Decision.
Moved by H. Nobes, seconded by P. Settimi
Carried
Resolved that Submission A-19/11 by Losani Homes, for a Minor Variance from the provisions of By-law 71-74, as amended by By-law 08-61, Section 11A, Residential R3 Zone to allow for the construction of a single dwelling unit with a lot coverage of 39% in a Residential R3 Zone at # 29 Chestnut Drive, Grimsby be granted or approved with conditions for the following reasons: 1. The Variance is minor in nature. 2. The intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law is maintained. 3. The proposal is desirable for the appropriate development of the land.
Moved by H. Nobes, seconded by P. Settimi
Carried
Resolved that Submission A-20/11 by William Berry, for a Minor Variance from the provisions of By-law 71-74, as amended Section 11 Residential R2 Zone to allow for the construction of an accessory structure (garage) with a lot coverage of 9.8% in a Residential R2 Zone at # 83 Lakeside Drive, Grimsby be granted for the following reasons: 1. The Variance is minor in nature. 2. The intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law is maintained. 3. The proposal is desirable for the appropriate development of the land.
Moved by R. Bennett, seconded by H. Nobes
Carried
Resolved that Submission A-21/11 by Paul Kucharuk, for a Minor Variance from the provisions of By-Law 71-74, as amended Section 11 Residential R2 Zone to allow for the construction of an accessory structure (garage) with a lot coverage of 11.2% in a Residential R2 Zone at # 60 Fairview Road, Grimsby be approved with conditions for the following reasons: 1. The Variance is minor in nature. 2. The intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law is maintained. 3. The proposal is desirable for the appropriate development of the land. Page 9 of 11 Committee of Adjustment July 12, 2011 Subject to the following conditions: a. That the existing garage be demolished prior to construction.
Moved by R. Bennett, seconded by P. Settimi
Carried
Resolved that Submission A-22/11 by Stephen and Tara Ostaszewicz, for a Minor Variance from the provisions of By-law 71-74, as amended, Section 11B, Residential R4 Zone to legalize the location of a 3.84 x 1.59 metre accessory structure with a side and rear yard setback of .55 metres in a Residential R4 Zone at # 2 Hewitt Drive, Grimsby be granted for the following reasons: 1. The Variance is minor in nature. 2. The intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law is maintained. 3. The proposal is desirable for the appropriate development of the land. Subject to the following conditions: a. Sound insulation be installed in the walls. b. Eaves troughs are affixed to the shed without encroaching on the adjacent properties; c. That 1.5 metre setback is maintained between the main dwelling and the shed and that no overhang, gutters or eaves project into this setback; and d. Comments are submitted by the Public Works Department that determine there will be no adverse impacts on the approved grading of the lands.
Moved by P. Settimi, seconded by H. Nobes
Carried

The town’s own record

Read the minutes this page was read from →

Where this page and that document disagree, the document is right and this record is wrong. Say so and it will be corrected.