Everything on this site is searchable — a file number, a councillor, a motion, a meeting, or an application.
Committee of Adjustment
May 18, 2021
What was decided (3 motions)
3 carried, 0 recorded otherwise. Every motion below is printed as the minutes print it.
Resolved that the minutes of the meeting held on April 20, 2021 be approved.
Moved by Member D. Beck, seconded by Member A. Mottershead
Carried
Resolved, that Application A12-21, 10A Shoreline Crescent to permit a dwelling depth of 27.99m whereas 20m is permitted; To permit a lot coverage of 18.62% for house and accessory structure whereas 15% is allowed, be approved with conditions for the following reasons: • The variances meet the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning by- law • The development is appropriate for the subject lands; • They are minor in nature. Conditions: 1. That the applicant receive Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority (NPCA) approval for the construction of the proposed dwelling and accessory dwelling. 2. That the applicant submit a Stage 1 archaeological assessment (and any required subsequent archaeological assessments) for the subject property to the Ministry of Heritage, Sport, Tourism Page 3 of 4 Committee of Adjustment May 18, 2021 and Culture Industries and acknowledgement letter from MHSTCI confirming that all archaeological resource concerns have met licensing and resource conservation requirements. No demolition, construction, grading or other soil disturbances shall take place on the subject property prior to the issuance of a letter from the Ministry of Heritage , Sport, Tourism and Culture Industries through Niagara Region confirming that all archaeological resource concerns have met licensing and resource conservation requirements. 3. That the applicant submit a detailed grading plan to the Public Works Department.
Moved by Member D. Beck, seconded by Member H. Nobes
Carried
Resolved that Submission A13-21 by Brad Brewer and Sarah Smith to permit a lot coverage of 27.5% whereas 25% is permitted; To permit a front yard setback of 8.23m whereas 11.3m is required, be approved for the following reasons: • The variances meet the intent of the Official Plan and Zoning by- law • The development is appropriate for the subject lands; • They are minor in nature.
Moved by Member D. Bailey, seconded by Chair K. Antonides